C-level Executives compensation: PE vs VC. Who is the best?

Many Private Equity backed companies are not following best practices to incentivize and compensate their portfolio CEOs and senior executive teams. That is the conclusion which arises from the new research conducted by Chief Executive Group.
While 88.4% of private equity backed companies employ formal annual incentive plans for top portfolio executives, only 68.1% of these Private Equity backed companies employ formal long-term incentive plans and many of those that do are not competitive with Venture Capital backed companies and comparably sized public companies.
While base salaries, bonuses and equity incentives are competitive for median CEO and CFO positions, top quartile Venture Capital portfolio executives are better compensated than Private Equity backed executives. And when it comes to technology positions like the head of R&D and CIO, the gap between Venture Capital and Private Equity backed firms get even larger.
According to Wayne Cooper, Managing Director, Chief Executive Research and co-author of the 2013-2014 CEO & Senior Executive Compensation Report for Private Companies, “While the median Private Equity portfolio CEO is better compensated than CEOs of other private owners, the top performers are underpaid on average, suggesting that many Private Equity firms are overpaying average performers and underpaying outstanding performers.” He added, “Senior executive compensation and incentive plans are key to attracting, retaining and motivating top talent, yet few Private Equity firms are properly aligning their portfolio company’s CEO and executive compensation programs effectively. There is a lot of leverage in getting this right and applying competitive best practices.”
Talent4Equity Team

- DisclaimerNews, data, and statements included in this release are intended exclusively for general information purposes. Talent4Boards does not guarantee that news is accurate or about the correct person and accepts neither liability for the consequences of the reader’s reliance, nor responsibility for the accuracy of the information. Nothing in this release should be considered for decisions about referred securities. Products and brand names may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners.

Comments are closed.